A couple of weeks ago, Katie Bursley, a daughter of David and Karen Siklosi and also a daughter of Keith Church, emailed me to inquire about how our church was addressing the question of wearing masks as we anticipated returning to in-person worship during the COVID-19 pandemic. Katie is serving as the lay leader of her United Methodist Church in Shreveport, Louisiana, and was interested in some guidance she might be able to share with their church leadership in their own preparations. I responded that our conference’s leadership had resolved the question of wearing masks for us by making it a non-negotiable requirement for all in-person worship services to be held in the Holston Conference. But I suggested to her that the Wesleyan Quadrilateral might provide some guidance on this question, and then I sought to “unmask” some of the ways in which this might be so.
For more information on what the Wesleyan Quadrilateral is and how it can help us engage in robustly biblical and theological reflections on any number of questions that Christians may face, I would refer you to my colleague the Rev. Andrew Lay’s podcast on it which came out last Monday (see “The Methodical Methodist Podcast” at https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-the-methodical-methodist-p-59418523/episode/ep-16-the-wesleyan-quadrilateral-65224114/).
Andrew describes how a Wesleyan scholar Albert Outler coined this term after witnessing how John Wesley wove these four sources together – scripture, tradition, reason and experience – in his sermons, essays and other writings. Even though it may sound a little too much like mathematics for some folks’ tastes, the Wesleyan quadrilateral continues to provide a helpful framework for exploring some of the questions Christians face today.
So what might the Wesleyan quadrilateral have to say about wearing masks during a time of pandemic?
Scripture (Part 1)
Because Wesley considered scripture the primary and foundational source among the four (thus the quadrilateral is not really an equilateral, but maybe more of a trapezoid, but again, that’s starting to sound too much like math!), I want to both begin and end with scripture. So what does scripture say about wearing masks? Truthfully, not much. At least, not directly.
In the Old Testament, there is the story of Rebekah wearing a veil at her match-making with her future husband Isaac (Genesis 24:65). There’s the scandalous story of Tamar wearing a veil to disguise her identity so that she can seduce her father-in-law Judah (Genesis 38:15). There’s the story of Moses wearing a veil to shield his fellow Israelites from the blinding brightness of his face shining from his encounter with the Lord upon the mountain (Exodus 34:33-35). There’s also a lot of veiling and unveiling in the interactions of the newlyweds in the Song of Songs. But other than that, the wearing of masks or veils figures very little in the Old Testament.
In the New Testament, it’s even sparser. Paul wanted women to wear veils while praying and prophesying but not men, but his words perhaps reflect more the misogynistic practices of the time than any relevant practices today (1 Corinthians 11:4-7). So the scriptures do not seem to directly and explicitly address our question of whether to wear our masks in the midst of a global pandemic. But the scriptures do address this question indirectly and implicitly, as I will suggest in a moment.
Tradition
What about the second resource that Wesley used, tradition? Tradition has to do with how the church has interpreted and applied the teachings of the scriptures over the years. Fortunately, Wesley himself has already done a lot of the heavy lifting for us in his distillations of the scriptural guidance that he provided in his sermons and essays. One of those distillations is found in the “General Rules” that he laid out for small groups to follow in their sharing of life and faith together. (Andrew has another episode on the “General Rules” in his podcast to which I would also refer you!) There are three General Rules, and though they are simple to state, they are not always easy to follow. In summary, the three rule are:
- Do no harm and avoid evil of every kind
- Do good and be merciful in every kind
- Attend upon all the ordinances of God (or as the late Bishop Reuben Job paraphrased it, “stay in love with God”)
The wearing of masks has been shown to help reduce the risk of spreading the virus to others (more on this in a moment), so it seems to satisfy the first general rule. It seems to help do, if not absolutely no harm at all, then at least less harm than not wearing a mask. It also seems to satisfy the second general rule in that it appears to actually help do some good in preventing the spread of the virus. In other words, wearing a mask might help meet two of the three “General Rules,” and as Meatloaf reminds us, “two out of three ain’t bad!”
We also have within our tradition the witness of one of the most famous Methodist evangelists of a century ago whose name is not only found on an elementary school in nearby Cleveland, TN, but also adorns the mammoth auditorium on the Methodist assembly grounds of Lake Junaluska, NC – George R. Stuart. He is quoted in the Birmingham, Alabama Age-Herald on October 14, 1918, during that pandemic, musing on what we might learn from this experience.
Stuart insisted that “intelligent Christians” turn to science rather than trying to “tempt God to perform a miracle in the preservation of our health…Christians do not discount their faith in the omnipotence of their God by keeping their bodies and homes and streets clean and nongerm producing; by using care in traffic and travel, accepting vaccination, sprays and disinfectants and keeping God’s own laws of health and life. Any other course is the fruit of ignorance and false teaching.” (Quoted on the Facebook post of First Christian Church of Chattanooga, March 25, 2020). Although Stuart doesn’t specifically mention masks, I can imagine he would include the wearing of masks if that is what the scientific and medical community was recommending.
Reason
This reliance upon the recommendations of the scientific community and the findings of scientific research represents the third resource in the Wesleyan quadrilateral for our theological reflection, reason. Wesley lived in the midst of the European Enlightenment, as new horizons of scientific inquiry and understanding were opening up in all directions. He saw our human faculty of reason as a God-given gift to help us better understand and appreciate the beauty and the glory of God’s bountiful creation and our responsibilities within it.
John Wesley was something of an amateur scientist himself. He published a book of home remedies called Primitive Physick that can certainly seem primitive by today’s standards but represented his best effort to provide practical help for the people of his day to be as healthy in body, mind and spirit as possible. I would like to imagine that if Wesley were writing his book today, he might have included not only insistence upon wearing a mask in a time of a pandemic but also instructions on how to make a homemade mask.
So, how does our human reason as exercised and expressed in the scientific enterprises today speak into this question of wearing masks? Well, three things must be said at the outset. First, the science about all of this – not just the effectiveness of wearing masks but also the transmission and potential mutation of the virus itself, the progression of the disease, the protection provided by antibodies, etc. – is continuing to unfold and it seems there are new developments nearly every day. This means, second, sometimes the recommendations from the scientific community can change over time, as it has over the past few months on the subject of wearing masks. And third – believe it or not – scientists, medical experts, health care professionals, etc. don’t always agree with one another!
But with those disclaimers in mind, I did find it interesting to hear a report on National Public Radio of an article published June 1 in the British medical journal Lancet of a meta-analysis of 172 different observational studies from across 16 different countries and 6 continents that found that wearing masks, along with physical distancing and eye protection, was demonstrably effective in reducing the risk of the transmission of the virus. (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31142-9/fulltext#%20) One of the co-authors of the study, Holger Schunemann, an epidemiologist at McMaster University, says that “what this evidence supports is that, if there is a policy around using face masks in place, it does actually come with a fairly large effect.” (https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/06/21/880832213/yes-wearing-masks-helps-heres-why)
But the article that grabbed my attention the most was one my wife Tracy shared with me as I was contemplating whether to shelve my own clippers and go get my hair cut by a bona fide professional. She shared with me an article about a Great Clips hair salon in Springfield, Missouri – I’ve gotten my hair cut many a time at a Great Clips – where two of the stylists contracted COVID-19 and went on to risk exposing at least 140 customers to the virus. But because the salon required masks to be worn by both the stylists and the customers, the wearing of masks was credited with preventing the potential spike that could have caused. In the weeks since this happened, none of the clients have come down with the virus. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/06/17/masks-salons-missouri/)
I am aware that not everyone believes these reports, and that there are some reviews that purport to show the opposite, that the wearing of masks is actually ineffective outside the hospital setting. Again, scientists don’t always agree with one another. But the escalating and overwhelming volume of scientific research supports the idea that wearing masks, along with other practices like handwashing and safe distancing, actually does help to prevent the person-to-person transmission of the coronavirus. It helps protect not so much the wearer from contracting the virus as it does from our (inadvertently, unknowingly) transmitting to others through talking, coughing, sneezing, shouting, singing, etc. Thus it seems to be true that we wear our masks not so much to protect ourselves as primarily to protect others. I wear it to protect you, you wear it to protect me, and so we all look out for and protect one another.
Scripture (Part 2)
Which brings me back to our first and foundational source in the Wesleyan quadrilateral for theological reflection on the questions facing Christians today – scripture. As I said earlier, even though the scriptures may not directly or explicitly address the question of whether or not to wear a mask during a pandemic, they absolutely and unquestionably address this question implicitly, indirectly, and they do so in at least four instances. Three of these four are found in the words of Jesus, and the fourth comes from the Apostle Paul.
First, when Jesus is asked in the Gospels which of all the commandments of God is the greatest, he answers, “Love God with all your heart, soul, mind and strength, and love your neighbor as yourself” (Matthew 22:34-40, see also Mark 12:28-34, Luke 10:25-28). Therefore, if wearing a mask reduces the risk of our neighbor – the person near to us – contracting this deadly virus, then that is what loving our neighbor looks like in a time of pandemic.
Second, on the last night Jesus was with his disciples, the night before he went to the cross, he gave them a new commandment. “I give you a new commandment,” he told them, “that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another” (John 13:34-35). If our wearing a mask helps protect one another from this virus, then that is what loving one another looks like. (And – bonus – it is also how others in the community will know we are Christian.)
Third, one of the teachings for which Jesus is most famous is the so-called “Golden Rule.” Found in some form in most of the major world religions, Jesus put it like this: “In everything, do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and prophets” (Matthew 7:12). If you expect me to do whatever I can to protect you and your health in this pandemic, and I expect you to do whatever you can to protect me, then both of us wearing a mask during a pandemic fulfills the Golden Rule. Again, this is not just according to Christian scriptures but other religions’ sacred writings as well.
Finally, this can also be inferred from Paul’s letters. In both Romans 14 and 1 Corinthians 8-9, Paul is addressing a question about whether it is appropriate for Christians to eat meat that has been sacrificed to idols. There are some in the Christian community who see no problem with this. Idols aren’t real, they say, so the fact that the meat has been sacrificed to an idol shouldn’t be cause for any real concern. Paul calls this group the “strong.” But there are others who are concerned about being contaminated by consuming food sacrificed to these false gods. After all, aren’t our bodies “contaminated” in a way with the life and spirit – the body – of Christ when we partake of food that has been consecrated in his name? Paul calls this group the “weak.”
Perhaps the terms he uses here are unfortunate. But although Paul himself agrees with the “strong” position – with those who say there’s no problem with food sacrificed to idols – he says he would rather go without eating meat than risk wounding the conscience of the “weak” for whom Christ died just as much as for him. Remarkably, Paul refuses to insist upon his own right to eat meat out of an even greater sense of responsibility for his fellow brother and sister in Christ. Why? Because that’s what love – the agape, self-giving, other-oriented, Christ-like love that Paul describes so beautifully in 1 Corinthians 13 – looks like.
In Paul’s eyes, there’s something even more compelling than our own individual rights and liberties and freedom, and that is our responsibility to others in our community. For Paul, the we is greater than the me (in mathematical terms, we>me). How relevant Paul’s rhetoric is to our day and to our question about masks!
There are those today who don’t believe this virus is a big deal, who believe it’s all been blown way out of proportion, that perhaps it’s even a hoax, a conspiracy, and that wearing a mask is useless and ineffective – and who want to assert their “right” not to wear one even when it’s requested or even required by state or local or church authorities. Let’s call this group, following Paul, the “strong.” Then there are others who aren’t so sure about that, who are taking the virus very seriously, who maybe have contracted the virus themselves or have lost someone very dear to them from this virus, who are following the recommendations of the scientific and health care experts to the letter. Let’s call this group the “weak.”
Would not following Paul’s argument and example here mean refraining from exercising our “right” to not wear a mask and wearing one anyway out of a greater sense of responsibility toward those who are worried and concerned? Not only would that be the even “stronger” thing to do – it takes more strength to refrain from exercising a right than to exercise it – but this is also, according to Paul, what love – Christ-like love – looks like.
So ultimately we can see that the scriptures join together with tradition and reason in commending the wearing of a mask during a time of pandemic as an expression of our Christ-like love and care and compassion for others. But wait – that’s only three sources? The quadrilateral is four sources. So what about the fourth – experience?
Experience
One of the things I mentioned in my email to Katie are the experiences of churches who have returned to in-person worship where the wearing of masks may have been recommended but not required nor apparently very widely practiced in those congregations. Several of these churches have had outbreaks of the virus traceable back to their worship services or choir rehearsals or fellowship suppers or other gatherings. Consequently, many of those churches have made the decision to re-suspend in-person worship services.
As I wrote to Katie, “No church wants that PR. Nobody wants to be that church.” No church wants to go through that experience. But my heart still sinks every time one of these stories comes across my news feed, and frankly, sometimes it makes me wonder what on earth we are doing going back to in-person worship so soon ourselves.
But if wearing a mask in worship can help reduce the risk of spreading the virus, then why not? What’s the big deal? Really. It is so sad to see how wearing a mask has become so politicized. I don’t care what your politics are or aren’t. A mask is not a political symbol. You shouldn’t wear it or refuse to wear it because you’re a Democrat or a Republican. I would hope we would wear it because we’re something even more definitive – a Christian! But even setting both politics and religion to the side, it’s such a small, simple, easy thing to do. And if it can stop the spread and save lives, then why on earth not?
Plus it can be a lot of fun to buy or make or give or receive masks that show a little personality, a little pizzazz, a little flair! You can sport a mask in the colors of your favorite team. You can even order a mask with a depiction of your mouth and smile on it! I kid you not!
I know it takes a little getting used to at first, but you actually get used to wearing one after a while. Some people – surgeons, dentists, welders – wear a mask all day long and think nothing of it. If wearing a mask for maybe 30 minutes in a grocery store or in a place of business or in a worship service helps to prevent the spread of this deadly virus and may even prevent a second wave of infections and allow an even quicker return to some sense of normalcy, then it is quite literally very nearly almost the absolute least I can do. And if it turns out in the end that all those naysayers were right all along and that wearing a mask doesn’t do a darn (trying to keep it PG here) bit of good for anybody, then it won’t have set me too far back anyway.
Finally, based upon the experiences of those who have contracted this virus and have been hospitalized in ICU units and have fought for – and so many have lost – their very lives while cut off from the love and presence and support of their family and friends and faith community, I can unapologetically and unequivocally say I would much rather wear a mask around my face than a ventilator down my throat.
So let’s do whatever we can to keep one another as safe and healthy as possible in the midst of this pandemic. Wash your hands. Watch your distance from others. And on the authority of at least four witnesses – scripture, tradition, reason and experience – when you’re out in public, wear a mask.
Pastor Dave